From January 7, 2025:
Join mind reader’s free community of radical thinkers analysing capitalism’s contradictions and imagining better futures. Start right now.
Before Luigi Mangione, There was Fred Hampton
↗︎ ↳Collective solidarity, intersectional solidarity, anti-racist solidarity and insistence on radical transformation — these are the keys to genuine liberation and equality. Not whatever ‘antidote’ capital is peddling today.
ML Summary"Before Luigi Mangione, There was Fred Hampton" by Kim Pistilli explores the historical context of violence as a response to systemic oppression, particularly within the healthcare system. It argues that the denial of healthcare is a form of violence that disproportionately affects marginalized communities, leading to severe health disparities. The article contrasts visible acts of violence, like police brutality against Black individuals, with the quieter, insidious violence of corporate and government neglect.
Pistilli discusses the legacy of revolutionary figures who advocated for self-defense and change, including Malcolm X and the Black Panther Party. The narrative highlights that while non-violence is often celebrated, the struggles of those who employed different tactics, such as Fred Hampton, are overlooked. The author critiques the societal response to Luigi Mangione's actions, suggesting that a young white man is perceived differently than a person of color would be in similar circumstances.
The piece calls for a revival of the Rainbow Coalition's goals, emphasizing the need for multiracial and inclusive movements to challenge systemic injustices. It argues that genuine change requires unity across diverse communities, advocating for the recognition of the contributions and sacrifices made by people of color in the fight against oppression. Ultimately, Pistilli urges a collective acknowledgment of past revolutionaries like Fred Hampton to inspire current and future activism.
From January 6, 2025:
Join mind reader’s free community of radical thinkers analysing capitalism’s contradictions and imagining better futures. Start right now.
Meta blames technical error for removal of LGBTQIA+ groups' Facebook posts
↗︎ ↳A new wave of war on queerness facilitated by “social media” (Meta - it’s all Meta) fits nicely with trump’s reign of terror in the US and other tech billionaires subscribing to culture-war protected oligopoly. —added 4:58pm on 06/01/25 ❧
Meta's AI Profiles Are Indistinguishable From Terrible Spam That Took Over Facebook
↗︎ ↳I don’t even understand what value people are deriving from being on these platforms — social connection? engaging conversations? quality media and links? I don’t think so. It’s AI slop and algorithm manipulation by right wing megacorps all the way down. —added 6:28am on 06/01/25 ❧
From January 5, 2025:
Support independent radical thought. Join mind reader’s growing community of readers thinking deeply about social transformation. Start right now.
Apple CEO Tim Cook Donating $1 Million to Trump's Inaugural Fund
↗︎ ↳If you had any remaining doubt about Apple as a company, or Tim as a human — let this put it to rest. “Scrappy underdog” Apple is not, “privacy first” Apple is not, “champion of LGBTQ+ in tech” Apple is not. They are evil, corrupt, oligopolistic, and fundamentally hegemonic — standing alongside other evil global megacorps like OpenAI, Tesla, Meta and countless other fascists. —added 5:52am on 05/01/25 ❧
From January 4, 2025:
Be part of the conversation. Join mind reader’s free community of readers analysing capitalism, technology and social change. Start right now.
ML SummaryElon Musk recently showcased Tesla's ability to remotely unlock and monitor vehicles following a Cybertruck explosion in Las Vegas. After the incident, law enforcement received assistance from Musk, who unlocked the vehicle and provided video footage from charging stations to track its location. Clark County Police Sheriff Kevin McKahill acknowledged Musk's contribution during a press conference, highlighting the valuable information provided regarding the vehicle's status and movements. This incident underscores a growing concern that vehicle ownership is evolving; while individuals can drive their cars, manufacturers like Tesla can access and control them remotely. The situation raises questions about privacy, as companies can share vehicle data with law enforcement. Although it remains unclear whether Musk personally executed these actions or directed Tesla staff, the implications of such capabilities are troubling. This development serves as a stark reminder of the increasing surveillance present in modern vehicles. Overall, the incident illustrates the tension between technological advancements and personal ownership rights.
It was a year of uncertainty for international education, and there's more to come
↗︎ ↳The politicisation of international students to ensure they’re depicted through xenophobic bullshit is nearly complete. Migrants are fucking important, people, and the university sector certainly shouldn’t be allowed to exploit them. —added 6:53am on 04/01/25 ❧
From January 3, 2025:
Want more analysis like this? Join mind reader (free) to never miss a dispatch. Start right now.
Digital Ownership and the End of Physical Media
↗︎ ↳Who owns the media you consume mostly? This is a very real problem and streaming services are only jacking the prices further. “Leisure” is already becoming segregated along class lines. The alternative, for low income workers, is free to air which spews hateful narratives and ads 24x7. —added 6:52am on 03/01/25 ❧
Are we ready for another pandemic?
↗︎ ↳Bringing communities together for a collective response to a threat to public health? Under individualist neoliberal and fascist governments in 2025? I don’t know man, sounds like pretty good odds. I mean have you seen the climate response? Everything’s going great! /s
ML SummaryThe Guardian's article discusses the world's readiness for another pandemic, reflecting on the aftermath of Covid-19, which resulted in over 14 million deaths and significant economic disruption. Despite global leaders recognizing the inevitability of future pandemics, negotiations for a new pandemic agreement stalled in 2024 amid ongoing health crises. Experts highlight the unpredictability of emerging health threats, citing recent outbreaks like mpox and concerns over bird flu, while emphasizing the need for improved surveillance and response systems. Maria van Kerkhove from the WHO notes advancements in detection technology but warns of complacency and the fragility of health systems post-Covid. Rwandan health minister Dr. Sabin Nsanzimana expresses concern over the cycle of neglect in pandemic preparedness, citing insufficient funding for necessary investments. The WHO's negotiations for a pandemic accord have faced setbacks, with increasing distrust among nations and unresolved issues regarding equitable access to treatments and vaccines. Despite the potential for a new agreement, experts fear it may lack enforceable measures. The article concludes with a stark assessment of global readiness, suggesting that preparations have not improved since the last pandemic.